Talk:Landis's Missouri Battery/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 19:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this dreckly. Harrias ^talk 19:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Prose

• "..Landis's Battery, as well as Guibor's Battery participated.." Needs a comma after "Guibor's Battery".
  • Done
• "The Confederates surrender Vicksburg.." This should be "surrendered".
  • Fixed
• "..and order to Demopolis, Alabama." Similarly, this should be "ordered".
  • Went with "were ordered"

Layout

• Add a short description.
  • Done
• MOS:NOTES suggests that References should come before Sources.
  • Done

Sourcing

• All to reliable sources, following a consistent citation format.

Images

• Appropriately captioned and licensed.
• Consider adding alt text.
  • Done

Overall a nice, neat article with very little wrong with it. Harrias ^talk 10:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

• @Harrias: - I've replied to all points so far. Do you think this one is ready for an ACR? I know it's a bit short, but there's not a whole lot to say here. Hog Farm (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Passing this as a GA. With regards to ACR, I think the only questions I would have (and I genuinely don't know the answer, but you probably do):
    1. Can this article, despite its size, be considered comprehensive?
    2. Does this article omit any significant sources that might discuss the subject?
  • If you are happy that neither of those points will be an issue, then I can't really see what criteria-based opposition there can be. (But no promises!) Harrias ^talk 20:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)